Mimarlıkta “Öznellik” Etiği ve “Özneleşme” Estetiği: Adolf Loos, Le Corbusier ve Sou Fujimoto Mimarlıkları

Mimarlıkta “Öznellik” Etiği ve “Özneleşme” Estetiği: Adolf Loos, Le Corbusier ve Sou Fujimoto Mimarlıkları

Authors

  • Tolga Sayın

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23835/tasarimkuram.471167

Keywords:

Sinema, Aesthetics, Subjectivity, Subjectivation, Adolf Loos, Le Corbusier, Sou Fujimoto, Drama, Photography, Cinema

Abstract

Ethics of subjectivity can reach out for the truth when an emergent particular situation in an event and its relational network is considered. Relational aesthetics of subjects are produced in many practical expressions. Architectural ethics in interpreting events problematizes virtual of the event and conscious and unconscious expressions of architects related to the event as a routine. The related things are denominated in aesthestic relations and emerges with mental imaginary and are expressed in language. These images become the foundamental problematics of transmission. In this paper privacy and publicness of architects producing ethical knowledge and forming the aesthetic images are discussed. Subjectivation of an architect being a subject, actor or witness, emerging the “power as truth” have forms showing compatibility and incompatibility with the power being practiced. Also, in this paper interpretation that produces subjectivity/self, takes the advantage of visual and auditory arts as drama, photography and cinema producing the power of truth. Strategic visibilities and masked invisibilities of subjectivities in practice present realities in ethics and relational aesthetics of architectural and art theories. Adolf Loos (1870- 1933), Le Corbusier (1887-1965) and Sou Fujimoto’s (1971-) production of subjectivities are interpreted in serial images in emerging realities. Architectural particularities relating modernity, modern city and the social; enonciations, works and utterances form textualities emerging a contemporary architectural image. These textualities are also singularities and read in a frame of ref erential concepts: Multiplicity, theatricality, event, mask, gap, margin, denomination, home, gaze, real/surreal, image, symbol etc..

Published

2023-03-29